Christians believe that what the Bible teaches is true, so we come to the Bible with what J. I. Packer calls \u201can advance commitment to receive as truth from God all that Scripture is found on inspection actually to teach.\u201d1<\/p>\n
All that the Bible teaches is truth from God, whether statements of fact about earth, heaven, humans, or God, or moral commands, or divine promises. This has been the universal affirmation of the church until the time of the Enlightenment, when acceptance in the secular academy led some biblical scholars to base their conclusions on culturally misguided reason rather than on revelation and reality.<\/p>\n
The affirmation of the truthfulness of the Bible is inextricably tied to the character of God himself. God is a truthful God who does not lie.2 Therefore, because God is ultimately the author of Scripture, it is perfect, unlike every other uninspired writing and utterance.<\/p>\n
Taken altogether, inerrancy is the shorthand way of summarizing all that the Scriptures say about Scripture. Inerrant means that the Scriptures are perfect, without any error. The doctrine of inerrancy posits that because God does not lie or speak falsely in any way, and because the Scriptures are God\u2019s Word, they are perfect.3 As a result, the entire Bible is without any error.4<\/p>\n
The Bible claims to be wholly true and therefore inerrant. We find such explicit statements in passages such as 2 Samuel 7:28, \u201cO Lord GOD, you are God, and your words are true\u201d; Psalm 19:7\u201310, which uses words such as perfect, sure, right, pure, true, and righteous; Psalm 119:42\u201343, 142, 151, 160, 163, which uses the specific word truth or true; and John 17:17,<\/p>\n
\u201cYour word is truth.\u201d Second Timothy 3:16 rightly says, \u201cAll Scripture is breathed out by God.\u201d<\/p>\n
Unlike the Bible, however, those of us who read and study it are not inerrant in our understanding of it.<\/p>\n
The Bible itself gives us much cause for humility as we approach the Scriptures because:<\/p>\n
If it appears that there is a contradiction in Scripture, we should first dig deeply into our Bible to see if what appears to be an error is, in fact, not an error once we have examined it more closely.11 In the end, it is perfectly reasonable to say that we do not have an answer for every question we may have, though we may as we learn more, or when we get to heaven and get the final word on everything. The kind of humility that a priori assumes that when we do not understand or initially disagree with Scripture that we, and not the Bible, are in error is essential to truly Christian study.<\/p>\n
A key point to remember is that self-testimony is valid and strong when that testimony is validated by sufficient evidence. The remarkable accuracy of the Bible in areas where we can check it gives us confidence that it is true in all areas.<\/p>\n
A telling example of the Bible\u2019s accuracy is in the transliteration of the names of foreign kings in the Old Testament as compared to contemporary extra-biblical records, such as monuments and tablets. The Bible is accurate in every detail in the thirty-six instances of comparison, a total of 183 syllables. To see how amazing this is, Manetho\u2019s ancient work on the dynasties of the Egyptian kings can be compared to extra-biblical records in 140 instances. He is right forty-nine times, only partially right twenty-eight times, and in the other sixty-three cases not a single syllable is correct! The Bible\u2019s accuracy is shown not only in the original work but in its copies as well.12<\/p>\n
Luke correctly identifies by name, title, job, and time such historical individuals as Annas,13 Ananias,14 Herod Agrippa I,15 Herod Agrippa II,16 Sergius Paulus,17 the Egyptian prophet,18 Felix,19 and Festus.20 Political titles were very diverse and difficult to keep straight since every province had its own terms and, worse yet, the terms constantly changed. Yet Luke gets them right: a proconsul in Cypress and Achaia,21 the undeserved title Praetor in Philippi,22 the otherwise unknown title of Politarchs in Thessalonica,23 Asiarchs in Ephesus,24 and \u201cthe chief man\u201d in Malta.25 The descriptions of local custom and culture are equally accurate. As John Elder states:<\/p>\n
It is not too much to say that it was the rise of the science of archaeology that broke the deadlock between historians and the orthodox Christian. Little by little, one city after another, one civilization after another, one culture after another, whose memories were enshrined only in the Bible, were restored to their proper places in ancient history by the studies of archaeologists. . . . Contemporary records of biblical events have been unearthed and the uniqueness of biblical revelation has been emphasized by contrast and comparison to newly discovered religions of ancient peoples. Nowhere has archaeological discovery refuted the Bible as history.26<\/em><\/p>\n This affirmation of the truthfulness of the Bible is exactly the attitude of Jesus himself. Frederick C. Grant, who is not any sort of fundamentalist Christian, acknowledges that the New Testament consistently takes \u201cfor granted that what is written in Scripture is trustworthy, infallible and inerrant. No New Testament writer would ever dream of questioning a statement contained in the Old Testament.\u201d27<\/p>\n Those parts of the Old Testament that are most commonly rejected as error are also those sections of Scripture that Jesus clearly taught. This includes creation,28 the literalness of Genesis 1 and 2,126 Cain and the murder of Abel,29 Noah and the flood,30 Abraham,31 Sodom and Gomorrah,32 Lot,33 Isaac and Jacob,34 the manna,35 the wilderness serpent,36 Moses as lawgiver,37 the popularity of the false prophets,38 and Jonah in the belly of a whale.39<\/p>\n In matters of controversy, Jesus used the Old Testament as his court of appeals.40 On many occasions where an Old Testament teaching was questioned, Jesus simply believed the clear teaching of Old Testament Scripture and defended himself by saying, \u201cit is written.\u201d41<\/p>\n Some of the most common critiques launched at the Old Testament are in regard to authorship, but Jesus actually named the authors of some<\/p>\n Old Testament books. For example, many Old Testament \u201cscholars\u201d boldly claim that Moses did not pen any of the first five books of the Bible, or that two or three authors penned Isaiah, none of whom was actually Isaiah. But Jesus taught that Scripture was authored by Moses,42 Isaiah,43 David,44 and Daniel.45<\/p>\n Following Jesus\u2019 example, while the New Testament authors often refer to the Old Testament in a rather general way, they also feel confident to appeal to the smallest detail. In Matthew 22:29\u201333, Jesus\u2019 argument rests on the present tense of \u201cto be\u201d in Exodus 3:6. Matthew 22:41\u201346 refers to the use of \u201cLord\u201d in Psalm 110:1. In John 10:34, Jesus\u2019 argument comes from the Old Testament use of the word \u201cgods.\u201d46 Also, Galatians 3:16 rests on the singularity of the Old Testament word translated \u201cseed\u201d or \u201coffspring.\u201d47<\/p>\n The standard for true prophecy was complete truthfulness, which is why Elijah was affirmed as a prophet: \u201cNow I know that you are a man of God, and that the word of the LORD in your mouth is truth.\u201d48 Can the standard for the Bible be any less, if it is truly prophetic?<\/p>\n Because Scripture is God speaking to us because he wants us to understand, Scripture usually speaks accurately in ordinary language.<\/p>\n Typically the writers use popular language rather than technical terminology. So they say, \u201cthe sun had risen,\u201d49 or refer to \u201cthe four corners of the earth.\u201d50 There are figures of speech like \u201cthe trees of the field shall clap their hands.\u201d52 There are also summaries, such as the Sermon on the Mount and Peter\u2019s sermon at Pentecost, which we do not have full transcriptions of but rather only a portion of what was preached.52 Sometimes, the Bible also gives us rounded numbers rather than exact head counts of, for example, the number of men killed each day during a war.53 To interpret the Bible accurately we must consider it carefully. Thus we interpret historical accounts, figures of speech, approximations, summaries, and such according to the author\u2019s intent, taking care lest our cultural and personal presuppositions distort our interpretation.<\/p>\n This does not mean there are no questions to explore. The biggest question from one of my seminary professors, Dr. Gerry Breshears, revolves around the numbers in the Bible book of Numbers. He says, \u201cCompared to archaeological estimates, they are too big by a factor of ten. There are several proposals for what is going on, but at this point, we don\u2019t know. A few decades ago, I also had questions about Jericho. According to the best archaeological reports, it was uninhabited from about 1600 BC to about 1200 BC. The Bible says the walls came tumbling down about 1440 BC. That would be hard if the city was already destroyed. But as excavations were done in a different part of the ancient site, a thick layer of ash containing grain was discovered. Dating by three different methods showed a burn date of (try to guess before you look!)\u20141440 BC.\u201d54<\/p>\n For good answers to questions about specific biblical \u201ccontradictions,\u201d see the New International Encyclopedia of Bible Difficulties by Gleason L. Archer Jr., or When Critics Ask by Normal Geisler and Thomas Howe. <\/em><\/p>\n Christians believe that what the Bible teaches is true, so we come to the Bible with what J. I. Packer calls \u201can advance commitment to receive as truth from God all that Scripture is found on inspection actually to teach.\u201d1 All that the Bible teaches is truth from God, whether statements of fact about earth, … Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"author":6,"featured_media":12,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_eb_attr":"","om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_relevanssi_hide_post":"","_relevanssi_hide_content":"","_relevanssi_pin_for_all":"","_relevanssi_pin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_unpin_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_keywords":"","_relevanssi_related_include_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_exclude_ids":"","_relevanssi_related_no_append":"","_relevanssi_related_not_related":"","_relevanssi_related_posts":"","_relevanssi_noindex_reason":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[305],"tags":[],"ministries":[],"topics":[211],"series":[],"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"link","format":"url"}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9502"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9502"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9502\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9502"},{"taxonomy":"ministries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ministries?post=9502"},{"taxonomy":"topics","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topics?post=9502"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/realfaith.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=9502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}1J. I. Packer, \u201cHermeneutics and Biblical Authority,\u201d Themelios 1.1 (Autumn 1975): 11. Also see http:\/\/ s3.amazonaws.com\/tgc-documents\/journal-issues\/1.1_Packer.pdf.<\/h6>\n
2Heb. 6:18; Titus 1:2.<\/h6>\n
32 Sam. 7:28; Titus 1:2; Heb. 6:18.<\/h6>\n
4Num. 23:19; Pss. 12:6; 119:89; Prov. 30:5\u20136.<\/h6>\n
5Isa. 55:9.<\/h6>\n
6Deut. 29:29.<\/h6>\n
71 Cor. 13:12.<\/h6>\n
8Rom. 1:18\u201319.<\/h6>\n
91 Cor. 13:9.<\/h6>\n
102 Pet. 3:15\u201316.<\/h6>\n
11When Critics Ask, by Norman Geisler and Thomas Howe, is very helpful in doing this (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1992).<\/h6>\n
12See John Wenham, Christ and the Bible, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 1994), 170\u201371.<\/h6>\n
13Acts 4:6; 23:2.<\/h6>\n
14Acts 23:2.<\/h6>\n
15Acts 12:1\u20133, 20, 23.<\/h6>\n
16Acts 25:13\u201326:32.<\/h6>\n
17Acts 13:7.<\/h6>\n
18Acts 21:38.<\/h6>\n
19Acts 23:23\u201324:27.<\/h6>\n
20Acts 24:27.<\/h6>\n
21Acts 13:7; 18:12.<\/h6>\n
22Acts 16:12, 20ff., 35ff.<\/h6>\n
23Acts 17:6, 9.<\/h6>\n
24Acts 19:31, 35.<\/h6>\n
25Acts 28:7.<\/h6>\n
26John Elder, Prophets, Idols, and Diggers: Scientific Proof of Bible History (New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1960), 16.<\/h6>\n
27Frederick C. Grant, An Introduction to New Testament Thought (New York: Abingdon-Cokesbury Press, 1950), 75.<\/h6>\n
28Luke 11:51.<\/h6>\n
29Matt. 19:4\u20135; Mark 10:6\u20138.<\/h6>\n
30Matt. 23:35; Luke 11:51.<\/h6>\n
31Matt. 24:37\u201339; Luke 17:26\u201327.<\/h6>\n
32John 8:56.<\/h6>\n
33Matt. 10:15; 11:23\u201324; Luke 10:12; 17:29.<\/h6>\n
34Luke 17:28\u201332.<\/h6>\n
35Matt. 8:11; Luke 13:28.<\/h6>\n
36John 6:31, 49, 58.<\/h6>\n
37John 3:14.<\/h6>\n
38Matt. 8:4; 19:8; Mark 1:44; 7:10; 10:5; 12:26; Luke 5:14; 20:37; John 5:46; 7:19.<\/h6>\n
39Luke 6:26.<\/h6>\n
40Matt. 12:40.<\/h6>\n
41Matt. 5:17\u201320; 22:29; 23:23; Mark 12:24.<\/h6>\n
42Matt. 4:4, 6, 10; 11:10; 21:13; 26:24, 31; Mark 1:2; 7:6; 9:12\u201313; 11:17; 14:21, 27; Luke 2:23; 4:4, 8,10, 17; 7:27; 10:26; 19:46; 22:37; John 2:17; 6:31, 45; 8:17; 10:34.<\/h6>\n
43Mark 7:10.<\/h6>\n
44Matt. 13:14; Mark 7:6.<\/h6>\n
45Mark 12:36.<\/h6>\n
46Matt. 24:15.<\/h6>\n
47Ex. 4:16; 7:1; 22:28; Ps. 138:1.<\/h6>\n
48Gen. 12:7; 15:3; 17:19.<\/h6>\n
491 Kings 17:24.<\/h6>\n
50Gen. 19:23; Mark 16:2.<\/h6>\n
51Isa. 11:12; Rev. 7:1; 20:8.<\/h6>\n
52Isa. 55:12.<\/h6>\n
53Mark 6:44; Acts 4:4.<\/h6>\n
54Judg. 20:44\u201347.<\/h6>\n","protected":false,"gt_translate_keys":[{"key":"rendered","format":"html"}]},"excerpt":{"rendered":"